News Numbness Creeps Into Coverage of Mass Murder
The events of the last few days, 14 killed in Binghamton, three of Pittsburgh’s finest, murdered in cold blood, brings up an interesting question for reporters citizens alike. Do important news stories have a shelf life? Or, as a country, are we getting too used to mass murder?. In Pennsylvania, only a few of the state’s daily newspapers ran the killings of the three Pittsburgh police officers on their front pages today (SUNDAY), which is the most important day of the week for newspaper reading. The New York Times, which bills itself as the nations paper, did not have a front page story. So that prompts a second question? If elements of the media don’t followup, does the public forget too quickly?
The Pittsburgh tragedy did not get the coverage it deserved. Followups on the upstate New York mass murder were limited. By last count, 48 people have been killed in mass murder in the last several years in America.
Followups are part of our business. But when journalists decide that mass murder is not a page one story, we are beginning to face a serious problem. When attention must be paid, it is up to the media to make it happen.
Cable networks and the internet blanketed these stories. And you wonder why newspapers are facing challenges.
I never try to second guess decisions, judgment decisions, that are made by news people. But the weekend events, in some newspapers, were not given the attention they deserve. And there’s no way to rationalize that simple fact.
On the last item, the Pittsburgh killings, one thing is clear. This is a major news story, and one that deserved front page treatment throughout this area.
One national web page asked this week if we have become numb to mass murder. Maybe we have. But if the media sees a short life for these stories, perhaps, in our minds, we forget much too quickly.

Comments(108)











