<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Managers: Turn Up The Volume On Political Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.larrykane.com/2008/06/15/news-managers-turn-up-the-volume-on-political-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.larrykane.com/2008/06/15/news-managers-turn-up-the-volume-on-political-coverage/</link>
	<description>LarryKane.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:25:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chiclettooth</title>
		<link>http://www.larrykane.com/2008/06/15/news-managers-turn-up-the-volume-on-political-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-8016</link>
		<dc:creator>Chiclettooth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larrykane.com/?p=570#comment-8016</guid>
		<description>Larry, while it would be wonderful if we could get some reasonable coverage of local politics on the local news, I just don&#039;t think it&#039;s going to happen.  Leo&#039;s right.  The local stations only seem to be interested in appealing to a demographic that tunes in for sensationalism.  Why isn&#039;t there coverage of the budget battle in Harrisburg?  Because it works better for the local stations to put on emotionally charged but relatively meaningless stories about a high school student being shot after graduation on Temple&#039;s campus.  If it bleeds, it leads, right?  It&#039;s probably the case that most local news viewers would just flip the channel if &quot;boring&quot; substantive stories were the focus of local news.  Instead, it feeds its audience a bunch of alarmist drivel about weather, traffic, crime, health, and consumer products.  You&#039;re asking too much of local news.  They&#039;re just in it to make a buck, not to carry out any lofty journalistic ideals of educating and informing the populace.  They have no journalistic integrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, while it would be wonderful if we could get some reasonable coverage of local politics on the local news, I just don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to happen.  Leo&#8217;s right.  The local stations only seem to be interested in appealing to a demographic that tunes in for sensationalism.  Why isn&#8217;t there coverage of the budget battle in Harrisburg?  Because it works better for the local stations to put on emotionally charged but relatively meaningless stories about a high school student being shot after graduation on Temple&#8217;s campus.  If it bleeds, it leads, right?  It&#8217;s probably the case that most local news viewers would just flip the channel if &#8220;boring&#8221; substantive stories were the focus of local news.  Instead, it feeds its audience a bunch of alarmist drivel about weather, traffic, crime, health, and consumer products.  You&#8217;re asking too much of local news.  They&#8217;re just in it to make a buck, not to carry out any lofty journalistic ideals of educating and informing the populace.  They have no journalistic integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.larrykane.com/2008/06/15/news-managers-turn-up-the-volume-on-political-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-8015</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larrykane.com/?p=570#comment-8015</guid>
		<description>Echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.larrykane.com/2008/06/15/news-managers-turn-up-the-volume-on-political-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-8014</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larrykane.com/?p=570#comment-8014</guid>
		<description>why are there no posts?  JR, where are you, did someone put you to sleep at the Vet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why are there no posts?  JR, where are you, did someone put you to sleep at the Vet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.larrykane.com/2008/06/15/news-managers-turn-up-the-volume-on-political-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-8013</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larrykane.com/?p=570#comment-8013</guid>
		<description>People who watch local news are usually too insipid to appreciate political coverage.  Also, with the various outlets from which people can get substantive coverage of national political issues, the local stations would serve as poor also rans, with their feeble &quot;anchors,&quot; who are really just &quot;newsreaders.&quot;  Could you imagine Alycia Lane trying to explain the Democratic system of allocating delegates?  I can&#039;t.  The local stations have a hard enough time covering substantive issues of local politics, breaking stories only when John Street waits to buy an iPhone or when Vince Fumo is hit with a hundred count indictment.  The local news should stick to what it&#039;s best at: silly hyped-up stories of fear and violence about the weather, about crime, and about consumer products.  The news &quot;product&quot; coming out of local stations is tabloid journalism for the TV medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who watch local news are usually too insipid to appreciate political coverage.  Also, with the various outlets from which people can get substantive coverage of national political issues, the local stations would serve as poor also rans, with their feeble &#8220;anchors,&#8221; who are really just &#8220;newsreaders.&#8221;  Could you imagine Alycia Lane trying to explain the Democratic system of allocating delegates?  I can&#8217;t.  The local stations have a hard enough time covering substantive issues of local politics, breaking stories only when John Street waits to buy an iPhone or when Vince Fumo is hit with a hundred count indictment.  The local news should stick to what it&#8217;s best at: silly hyped-up stories of fear and violence about the weather, about crime, and about consumer products.  The news &#8220;product&#8221; coming out of local stations is tabloid journalism for the TV medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.larrykane.com/2008/06/15/news-managers-turn-up-the-volume-on-political-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-8012</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larrykane.com/?p=570#comment-8012</guid>
		<description>You are correct Larry! Hopefullly they are listening and if they are smart will bring you back to do substantive segements between now and the election. It&#039;s almost like there is an aversion to covering politics at the three local stations.  News FLash; this is the biggest newsworthy election in over 50 years, young people do care about the issues shown above, as evidenced by their ethusisasm for Obama, its what people talk  about at work and in bars across the Delaware Valley. Since most people dont read newspapers anymore its all the more reason to put the facts on TV News.  Wake up News Directors and give us some substance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct Larry! Hopefullly they are listening and if they are smart will bring you back to do substantive segements between now and the election. It&#8217;s almost like there is an aversion to covering politics at the three local stations.  News FLash; this is the biggest newsworthy election in over 50 years, young people do care about the issues shown above, as evidenced by their ethusisasm for Obama, its what people talk  about at work and in bars across the Delaware Valley. Since most people dont read newspapers anymore its all the more reason to put the facts on TV News.  Wake up News Directors and give us some substance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

