The Two Faces of Republicanism - Schwarzenegger and Limbaugh - The Progressive and the Pessimistic
Blame this entry on Howard Dean.
The inept leadership of Dean banished the delegates from Michigan and Florida. Therefore, Republicans got all the headlines this week. The Democratic National Committee’s action was so wrong that even Hillary Clinton called for a reversal at the end. So, now, in the week before Super Duper Tuesday, the GOP gets most of the ink.
Biggest ink was McCain’s victory in Florida. After that, Governor Arnold’s endorsement of McCain may have been the most important nod of the campaign, even more important than the Kennedy’s anointment of Obama. Schwarzenegger is perhaps viewed as the most progressive Republican in the nation. He has strong appeal to moderates, and especially independents, but the impact may go much further than this Tuesday. The Governor’s appeal to Democrats is rock-solid. His blessing of John McCain may help McCain in a big way, if McCain captures the nomination.
It is ironic that McCain may be the most electable of all Republicans. And that is driving Rush Limbaugh a bit crazy. The darling and pioneer of “hard right” radio says there is a fracture in the Republican party. With that, the baiting, aggressive Limbaugh, took off on John McCain.
McCain, who is hardly a liberal, is just not conservative enough for Limbaugh. To be in the ultra-conservative camp, you have to be labeled all-things right wing - pro-war, anti-abortion , anti-gay, and of course, most true conservatives would be railing against drug-abuse, right Rush?
But here’s the truth. Rush Limbaugh secretly wants a Democrat to be elected. The George W. Bush era has minimized his influence. Bring in Hillary or Obama and Limbaugh is back on track. After all, his career rocketed during the Bill Clinton years.
True conservatives, like Hannity and Smerconish, would welcome McCain’s rise. But Limbaugh wants a loser . The only thing important to him is that he plays a role in a White House victory.
A little space for the Democrats here. As is always the case when people concede, John Edwards looked strong in defeat. Clinton and Obama were gracious, and they should be. I don’t think Edwards was a spectacular candidate, but in the area of seeking solutions for the impoverished, he was a magnificent advocate.
Unfortunately, those who “have” in America need to pay more attention to those who do not. We are philanthropic as individuals, but politically, we have dropped the ball.

Comments(27)











