By: Jersey Joe

Jersey Joe — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 22:39:17 +0000

Larry: It’s not an obsession with Sandy berger, in particular. It’s that I see a connection between stories. Sandy Berger steals secret Clinton era documents, however, no one seems to be able to pin down which documents and, more importantly, why Sandy stole the “unknown” documents. Short of just a dismissal as “bizarre” behavior on a former Nationl Security Advisor’s part, what can one make of the incident? Sandy cops a plea, gets a light sentence (small fine) through a plea bargain with the Republican US Attorney General. Wait. What’s up with that? One would think that the Republicans would make a big deal of going after a Clinton foot-soldier, just as the Dems were going after Scooter Libby and Karl Rove and yet, they don’t. As a matter of fact, the Judge, at Sandy’s sentencing felt the plea bargain was much too lenient on the AG’s part and upped Sandy’s fine. So, all is well, for awhile…and all is forgotten for a few years regarding Sandy until Hillary hires Sandy as an “unpaid” advisor. Huh? What’s up with that? Hillary has more campaign money than all the other candidates and can’t afford to pay Sandy a salary? Well, that only makes sense when one connects the fact that Sandy would have to get a security clearance if he were on Hillary’s payroll. Of course, Sandy can’t get a clearance for another year or 2 because of his guilty plea to the old document theft case. So, now, Larry, things are making sense. And then, out of the blue, Tim Russert blind-sides Hillary with a question about releasing documents from the National Archives. Hold on…wasn’t that where Sandy was when he stole the “unknown” documents? Now, as of today, Hillary and Bill are refusing to allow their secret communications, stored at the Clinton Library in Arkansas, to be made public. What is up with that? Of course, the Bill Clinton pardon of Marc Rich (of Food for Oil fame), who contributed at least $1 Million to the Clinton Library gets looked at because there may be some investment issues with Hillary, who is noted for being able to pick out a great pork belly when she sees one. So, Larry, yes, I am connecting the dots. Yes, Larry, I see a story here. Now, Larry, let’s me and you, Investigative Reporters both, take this door that has been opened to wherever it takes us.

By: Larry Kane

Larry Kane — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:00:50 +0000

Joe: You have an obsession with Berger. Who knows? You might be on to something.

By: Jersey Joe

Jersey Joe — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:55:19 +0000

So, Larry, do you think the National Archives Question by Russert had anything to do with Sandy Berger stealing secret Clinton documents from the National Archives a few years ago, and now, he is hired as an advisor by the Clintons? Is it possible that Sandy felt betrayed by the Clintons after being a loyal soldier all these years and stole the documents in order to ensure his future in the Clinton Whitehouse? Or, do you think he stole the Clinton documents at the behest of Hillary & Bill in order to forestall a derailment of her campaign for president?

Comments on: GREAT CHOICES? OR ARE WE STUCK IN REVERSE AS CAMPAIGN 08 ROLLS ON

By: Jersey Joe

By: Larry Kane

By: Jersey Joe